'Compare and contrast the Muslim and Israelites empires in history...in terms of politics, war, trade, religion, and/or social history.'

' origination\nThe rulern association is sicd by some of the past events and ways of life. The planetary society is characterized by heap from various ethnic backgrounds. distri exclusivelyively and every several(prenominal) belongs to a authentic specific free radical and it is from that group that unrivaled can define their own background. mint be adequate to find their identicalness by relating to where they write in code from and the activities that they carry aside. This thus means that the military personnel is made up of individuals from different ethnical, sparingal, genial and political settings. It is and so in lightness of this point that the rivet of this paper leave be ground on the argument amidst Islamic and Israelites pudding st aces in storey in equipment casualty of their political, economic, social and cultural settings.\n\nThe Moslem empire is conceptualized to bind begun in the 7th ampere-second with Mohammad in what is cur rently known as Saudi Arabia. Mohammad introduced a showcase of war which was known as international jihad; this war was termed as the consecrated war and its shoot for was to force heap into Islam. Mohammad used the war as a way of expanding his empire. He was successful as some(prenominal) slew were turned into Muslims in some regions in North Africa and others in the Middle East. The Israelites empire was but organise in a different means form how the Muslim empire was organize. This was create during the great historic even menti matchlessd in the bible called the exodus; this is when the Israelites were leaving Egypt afterwards being slaves for numerous years (Parfitt 256). They conquered the inflict of Canaan at a lower place Joshuas leading and it is from then on that the empire continue to grow. Unlike the Muslims, Israelites did non force masses to be one of them. Politically the Muslim empire was organize in a dictatorial physique of leadership tr ance the Israelite empire was formed a= chthonic a monarchial block out of leadership.\n\nAs has been mentioned thereon earlier, the Muslim empire had a type of war called jihad and it was known as the holy war. It was believed that whoever died in this war went to heaven. Mohammad is the one who introduced this war with an enterprise to convert nation to Islam or earlier spread the Islamic worship. This therefore asserts that religion in the Muslim Empire was and salvage is of great logical implication to the Islamists. The Israelites however do not ask such a war as they do not believe in forcing people to transmogrify and become Jews (Yaacov 610). The Israelites believe that Jesus deliveryman is the son of matinee idol moreover Islamists on the other tip over believe in Mohammad as the visionary who will exercise way for them to enter the kingdom of perfection whom they call Allah.\n\nThe Islamists busy in occupation and most of the things which were champions hipd include ornaments, golden, silver and animals as they were cattle herders. Their lands were characterized with a lot of gold and that is why many Arabian countries are inhibited by wealthy merchants. The Israelites on the other pass also carried out trading but for them there was no gold but silver. Silver was their mode of exchange and careless(predicate) of that fact some(prenominal) of these empires carried out trade as an economic activity. This is somewhat of a similarity between them. The social narrative of these two empires differs withal in that Islamists were not allowed to interact with people from other tribes. Israelites however did not have any restrictions as to which people they should fella with or not (Singh 123).\n\nConclusion\nThe preceding(prenominal) information depicts on the contrast and resemblance of the Muslim and the Israelites Empires in relation to their historical settings.'